Changing reward roles for changing times
As the role of reward professionals evolve, explore what benefit practitioners should do to be successful
As the role of reward professionals evolve, explore what benefit practitioners should do to be successful
Expectations for the role of benefits professionals are constantly evolving to meet changing needs. How is a practitioner able to navigate the benefits landmines and protect the interests of all stakeholders? This article highlights what benefit practitioners should do to be successful.
Unlock exclusive, tailored content and resources, just for members.
Sign in to accessNot a member yet? Find out how you can become a member today!
Tackling barriers to work today whilst creating inclusive workplaces of tomorrow.
Discover our practice guidance and recommendations to tackle bullying and harassment in the workplace.
Charles has recently led research into the business case for pensions, how front line managers make and communicate reward decisions, and managing reward risks, as well as the creation of a good practice guide on the annual pay review process. He is also responsible for the CIPD’s public policy work in the area of reward and is a Chartered Fellow of the CIPD.
Read our submission to the Low Pay Commission regarding the 2024 consultation
This guide explains in-work poverty, its effects and what employers can do to help
Guidance for HR practitioners and employers to support their employees’ financial wellbeing
Introduces the basics of reward, which includes pay and benefits, and outlines the UK legal position
Algorithms can help speed decisions and help organisations to operate more efficiently or profitably, but what are the pitfalls particularly from an ethical perspective?
How might role ambiguity lead to workplace bullying and what is the impact of leadership support in negating this effect?
An exploration of how generative AI tools like ChatGPT can be used effectively to support human resource management
When cost savings are required, what is the impact of making pay cuts instead of redundancies?