We look at how organisations are tackling the transformation of their HR structure, the main focus areas and share practical examples from five organisations who are optimising their HR operating model
Taking a planned approach to HR operating model transformation can redefine how the function delivers value to the organisation and its stakeholders. This can range from large-scale disruptive overhauls, involving the restructuring of the entire function, to incremental, small-scale changes and adaptations of the model that appear outdated and inefficient. Regardless of the degree and scale of transformation, it’s critical that the operating model of the people function aligns to the organisation’s goals, vision and strategy to enable the function to be a strategic partner to the wider business.
In CIPD’s 2015 operating model research, Barry Fry, a former global director of organisation development, argues that models may need to compromise on some areas to maximise the overall value of the function and serve the business needs at the time. “It is a myth that there is a perfect structure. Every structure entails a series of compromises, for example the loss of standardisation for the benefit of localisation, or vice versa.”
For the people function to add value and impact, the HR structure needs to align to the wider organisation and business strategy. Taking an organisation design (OD) approach enables an effective review of the function and helps determine how to optimise the model so that it is fit for purpose. It is inevitable that there will be different ways to deliver on this, and no one right way, but taking an OD approach will help to ensure the people function is more effectively set up to deliver value to its stakeholders. Let’s consider how some organisations are tackling this in practice.
Establishing the current picture through data, insights and expert consultation will help identify opportunities for optimisation and diagnose current gaps in the model. For example, a thorough analysis may highlight where the people strategy lacks alignment to the organisational strategy or where the current HR model fails to deliver against growth plans.
In the first article of this series, we outline three main reasons for redesigning HR structures: in response to an internal or external factor, to better align with the organisation’s strategy and purpose, or to increase efficiency.
People professionals at the large organisations we spoke to had their finger on the pulse when it came to horizon scanning for key trends impacting their workforce and business. These trends included:
A key part of this was gaining input from the leadership and executive teams to explore the strategic areas that are driving change and how the people function needed to shift in response to this. The CIPD’s PESTLE analysis template can offer a way of exploring the external influences on your business and what’s driving the need for transformation.
On the other hand, medium-sized organisations were more likely to focus on the internal drivers and undertook basic planning exercises to identify capability gaps. This included what roles were needed to enable a future-fit people function, and how teams should be organised and interact with the wider business. Sally Hopper, Director of Human Resources at Hertfordshire County Council, used the CIPD Profession Map to inform and define HR roles that were needed within their new HR structure.
Once the drivers are understood, use this to develop your vision for the people function. Here are the strategic shifts that some people functions identified to crystallise their vision and drive perceived value and impact:
Medium-sized organisations mostly made smaller tweaks or variations to their existing structure. This included the reorganisation of teams, introduction of new roles (or making changes to existing roles), and decisions around whether to in-source or outsource HR activity. However, the larger case study organisations undertook significant shifts in their operating models, resulting in high levels of disruption to current operations and innovations which required a change in the organisational culture, and behaviours and skills of the people function.
Some common key decisions that people functions made when designing their future HR structure included:
The decision to be more or less centralised as a function should fit the wider business structure (Ulrich, 2023). In practice this is normally a hybrid model, where activities that can be standardised are centralised, while those that need to respond to local needs are decentralised (see Figure 1 for pros and cons). Organisation size, geographical spread or the need for localisation are some factors that influence this decision.
“It’s important to avoid overlaps and gaps in service delivery,” said Natalie Sheils, Founder and CEO of Talenaut and former Chief People Officer at Mosaic Group. That includes making sure there are no overlaps or gaps in roles, responsibilities and accountabilities within the structure. Sheils added: “Regular feedback loops between centralised and decentralised teams can drive continuous improvement and alignment with business needs.”
| Model | Pros | Cons |
| Centralised HR maintains control and coordination of functions at a central location |
Better alignment with overall business objectives and standardise processes across the organisation. Drive efficiency through reduced duplication and simplified processes |
Lack of localisation. Not adapting to local market or business needs |
| Decentralised teams embed decision-making and control at a local level, within business units or geographies |
Swiftly respond to local needs to provide tailored and flexible HR support. Closer collaboration with local business or department leaders. |
Can be inconsistent, duplicating efforts at organisation level. Less standardised approach to implementing HR processes and technology. |
|
A hybrid model balances centralised strategic functions with decentralised operational capabilities |
A more balanced mix of global consistency and local adaptability | Requires more management and collaboration between teams |
Automating HR processes and improving systems was a key consideration for most practitioners that we interviewed. The aim was two-fold – to maximise efficiency and provide a positive employee experience when stakeholders interact with the function (see NatWest Group and Tesco).
For Peck Kem, Chief HR Officer for the Singapore Civil Service, leveraging digital technology is about: “How should we structure not only the organisation but also the work? What [elements of HR] could be self-service?” Another way to look at it could be to identify tasks that need a simple outcome and those that would be valuable or necessary to interact with someone.
When developing a future-fit operating model for the function, people teams commonly tackled considerations around what HR should take ownership for.
We found responsibilities were reallocated in these ways:
Key enablers that were highlighted in the case studies included:
Enabling factors like technology, leadership and capability support the people function to optimise their HR operating models and build an effective HR function. In the next article of the series, we’ll be taking a deeper dive into these key enablers which support how such models are embedded.
It’s important to develop a clear transformation plan outlining what will be implemented (including how and when) and the potential impact upon the wider business. The people function will need to maintain the day-to-day operational functions, minimise disruption, manage expectations and effectively communicate the upcoming changes. If there are large shifts in how HR services are being provided to the business, this will take longer to put into practice. For example, moving from a high-support HR service to a more self-service/leader-led model.
Outlined above as a key enabler, it is critical to identify key stakeholders and influencers within the people function and wider business. Not only is their input critical for optimisation, but the support and buy-in from leaders within the business is crucial for landing the transformation, especially when there are high levels of disruption to critical parts of the business. Joanne Carlin, Senior Vice President HR Europe at Firstsource, emphasises this point: “Without them [business leaders], it wouldn’t have happened. I needed them to talk positively in their peer groups about the changes that were happening.”
The case study organisations benchmarked outcomes against their key objectives to assess the effectiveness and impact of the transformation. Key metrics included:
NatWest Group also developed objectives to reflect the future vision of the model, including annual objectives and key results to provide tangible measures of success.
Both Tesco and NatWest Group used ‘big room planning’ to embed the new model and allow key stakeholders, across functions, to meet on a regular basis. These structured sessions allowed decision-makers to agree strategic priorities, collaborate on projects and deploy the relevant resources as necessary. The operating model will be reviewed in line with key objectives and changing business needs. To sum up, businesses tackled the transformation of their HR operating models in very different ways depending on their aims for their future vision of the function, the scale of transformation, resource constraints/levels of investment and business imperative for making these changes. The HR operating model is one piece of the puzzle for effective and high-performing people functions. In the next article in the series, we cover other enabling factors that are needed to support the implementation of a new HR model.
Access the full case studies and article series.
Acknowledgements and key contributors: Natalie Sheils, Peck Kem, Louise Wilson, Sally Hopper.
Case study organisations: Firstsource, Homebase, Peabody, Tesco and NatWest Group.
A series of thought leadership, case studies and podcast on current practices, future models and successful transformations
Rebecca joined the Research team in 2019, specialising in the area of health and wellbeing at work as both a practitioner and a researcher. Before joining the CIPD Rebecca worked part-time at Kingston University in the Business School research department, where she worked on several research-driven projects. Additionally, Rebecca worked part-time at a health and wellbeing consultancy where she facilitated various wellbeing workshops, both externally and in-house.
Rebecca has a master’s degree in Occupational Psychology from Kingston University, where she conducted research on Prison Officers’ resilience and coping strategies. The output of this research consisted of a behavioural framework which highlighted positive and negative strategies that Prison Officers used in their daily working life.
How a local charity organisation adapted to change and turned crisis into sustainable growth
From structures to processes to people, organisations undergo frequent change, and in today’s context, often with increasing complexity. But what role can L&D play, better positioning them as operational partners of change?
Explores the purpose and evolution of job design, its role in creating good work, and assessing job quality.
CIPD pay and reward adviser Charles Cotton examines how potential changes to pensions in the UK could affect employers, and what the implications could be for those in HR
Correspondence with the Secretary of State for the Department of Business and Trade outlining the CIPD's belief that the Employment Rights Bill should now be passed.
This month – Employment Rights Bill update, statutory digital HR1 forms and Keep Britain Working report
This month – Employment Rights Bill update, statutory digital HR1 forms and Keep Britain Working report