Stress tools
Use our range of practical tools to help you spot the signs of stress and take steps to manage and reduce workplace stress
The CIPD’s senior policy adviser on employee relations, Rachel Suff, looks at whether statutory sick pay is fit-for-purpose for employees, and how the government could reduce the cost burden on small businesses
Following the publication of its Employment Rights Bill (ERB), the UK Government has published a consultation on strengthening Statutory Sick Pay (SSP).
The bill makes three key reforms to SSP by:
The CIPD welcomes these reforms as we have championed the need for effective SSP reform for several years. We have responded to previous government consultations on the topic, conducted research and gathered insights from members to inform our policy recommendations.
But will these reforms alone achieve the government’s aim of ensuring that “no one should be forced to choose between their health and financial hardship” become evident over time? Or are further changes needed to create an effective financial safety net for people when they are too ill to work?
The consultation has one focus – to determine an appropriate percentage of earnings that should be paid to employees earning below the LEL. The consultation paper says:
“It is important that this percentage strikes the right balance between providing the financial security that employees need, retaining the incentives to return to work when appropriate, and balancing the costs to businesses”.
Different modelling for low earners is presented based on percentage rates ranging from 60% to 80% of their earnings.
It’s completely right that an employee should not be paid more to be off sick than they would receive through normal wages if they were working. That could act as a perverse incentive and not encourage a timely return to work. But it could be argued that an important principle for extending SSP eligibility to the lowest-paid and most vulnerable is to provide an effective financial safety net in the event of ill health. This should, at the very least, ensure that low-paid employees who will now be eligible for SSP are not worse off under the new system.
And yet the consultation highlights the case of some employees who currently earn just above the LEL who may see a reduction in their weekly SSP entitlement following these reforms, as they would no longer qualify for the flat rate. For example, an employee earning £125.00 per week would receive £75 per week in SSP if the percentage rate is set at 60%, compared to £116.75 currently.
The CIPD’s view is that low earners, who are likely to be the most financially vulnerable, should be eligible for the weekly flat rate of SSP or their wages, whichever is the lowest. Many employees, typically working for large and/or public sector employers and in higher-paid jobs, receive much more generous occupational sick pay as part of their terms and conditions. In the public sector, this is very likely to be full pay for as long as six months of absence, followed by half pay for a further six months. Therefore, it seems fair that lower earners should at least be eligible for the flat rate of £116.75, or their normal weekly wage if it is lower.
The legislative changes set out in the ERB are a very good step in the right direction for SSP reform. We must acknowledge the additional financial burden that will fall on organisations, particularly small and micro businesses, because employers are solely responsible for paying SSP. Removal of the three waiting days for receiving SSP will have the biggest impact.
However, the CIPD and previous government consultations have considered the need for more far-reaching reform for an effective sick pay system to support people’s health. Further changes are needed which are supported by evidence gathered from our survey of 1,176 HR professionals, many of whom are CIPD members, conducted in the autumn of 2024. For example:
The UK’s SSP system has been broken for a long time, and we need a longer-term root and branch review of how it could be reformed to better support the health of the working-age population. Further, SSP reform cannot be considered in isolation.
We need public policy change across the work and health agenda, including a national quality occupational health offering to SMEs, to really shift the dial on workplace health. We look forward to continuing our work in partnership with the government on this agenda and collaborating with other organisations who share similar goals for SSP reform as part of the Safe Sick Pay campaign.
Rachel Suff joined the CIPD as a policy adviser in 2014 to increase the CIPD’s public policy profile and engage with politicians, civil servants, policy-makers and commentators to champion better work and working lives. An important part of her role is to ensure that the views of the profession inform CIPD policy thinking on issues such as health and wellbeing, employee engagement and employment relations. As well as conducting research on UK employment issues, she helps guide the CIPD’s thinking in relation to European developments affecting the world of work. Rachel’s prior roles include working as a researcher for XpertHR and as a senior policy adviser at Acas.
Use our range of practical tools to help you spot the signs of stress and take steps to manage and reduce workplace stress
Rachel Suff, Senior Policy Adviser at the CIPD, uses recent data from the CIPD’s Health and wellbeing at work survey report, supported by Simplyhealth to offer recommendations for organisations and UK Government policy-makers to help reduce record-high employee absence
Find out what people professionals said about their working lives and career development prospects in our recent pulse survey
As artificial intelligence continues its rapid advancement and becomes the much touted focus for investment and development, we highlight the critical role of the people profession and explain how the CIPD and its members will be involved shaping its impact at work
A look at whether artificial intelligence can cover skills shortages by exploring the benefits of AI and the advantages that can be gained by using generative AI such as ChatGPT
Jon Boys discusses the benefits of generative AI tools, and how organisations can utilise them