In last week’s Budget the Chancellor revealed that poor levels of productivity, according to forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), would mean that the UK’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) would grow by 5.7% over the next five years. This was down from the predicted 7.5% growth expected back in March. He told the House of Commons:

…regrettably our productivity performance continues to disappoint.

The OBR has assumed at each of the last 16 fiscal events that productivity growth would return to its pre-crisis trend of about 2% a year, but it has remained stubbornly flat.

So today they revise down the outlook for productivity growth, business investment, and GDP growth across the forecast period.

The news about productivity yesterday, however, wasn’t entirely unexpected. This was because last month saw the OBR publish its October 2017 Forecast Evaluation Report. It compares its twice-yearly economic and financial forecasts against what happened and tries to find out why forecasts went awry. For such a technical report, it got a lot of media coverage, such as coverage in the Independent and on the BBC.

The reason for this level of coverage was that the report looked at our labour productivity growth and recognised it wasn’t just hiding behind the corner – it had gone missing. As the chart below shows, labour productivity – measured by output per hour – peaked just before the financial crisis, in 2007 Q4. It briefly exceeded that level in 2015 and 2016, but fell in the first two quarters of 2017.

The OBR expected productivity to fall during the recession (this usually happens), but they also expected it to bounce back towards its long-term average growth rate of 2% or so once the economy picked up. When this didn’t happen in 2012, they said it would happen in 2013; then in 2014; then in 2015.... As the OBR data shows, this faster rate of productivity growth was always just around the corner.

This phenomena been talked about for a few years as the productivity puzzle. Explanations are legion and there’s unlikely to be a single cause, and explanations based on what happened during the financial crisis are now looking increasingly unlikely. The OBR seemed at first to admit they have no easy explanation – productivity has slowed down throughout the G7, so the problem (and its causes) goes beyond the UK. But the OBR does hint at an explanation for the anaemic productivity growth of late. Business investment in the capital, necessary to improve worker productivity, was expected to grow in 2015 and 2016 but investment was much weaker than expected. The OBR also concede that they consistently under-estimated the strength of the UK labour market; the UK grew by working more, not by improving the productivity of the hours worked.

The consequence of lower productivity growth over the next few years will be lower future tax receipts and so less financial leeway at a time when there may be bills to pay (although of course politically ambitious expenditure promises will require more tax rises to fund them). This apparently technical correction will narrow the choices available to politicians, possibly for years.

So can government action raise productivity? To an extent, yes, especially by well-targeted investments in infrastructure, research, skills and management (see the article on People Skills). But, two years ago, the then-Chancellor launched a government productivity plan. Admittedly we didn't think much of it, and it’s a little unfair to judge it by short-run results, but productivity is now lower than when it was published.

About the author

Mark Beatson

Mark Beatson, Senior Labour Market Analyst

Mark's respected labour market analysis and commentary strengthens the CIPD’s ability to lead thinking and influence policy making across the whole spectrum of people management and workplace issues.

Prior to joining the CIPD, Mark was an economic consultant and for over 20 years worked as an economist in the Civil Service, latterly at Chief Economist/Director level, in a range of Government departments including the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS), the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and HM Treasury.

More on this topic

People management and productivity

Insights into productivity and people management practices

People sat together laughing in office
Thought leadership
Is the UK Government’s ‘mini-MBA’ scheme heading for a pass or a fail?

Mark Beatson explains what the UK Government’s Help to Grow: management scheme is and assesses whether it is working

Empty Office
Thought leadership
Economic strategy needed to boost UK productivity and growth

CIPD’s Head of Public Policy, Ben Willmott, highlights key insights and conclusions from the recent CIPD policy report

Policy engagement
A revitalised industrial strategy to boost innovation and productivity across all sectors of the UK's economy

We’ve been engaging with key stakeholders and policy makers to make the case for changes to a range of policy areas including skills development and labour market enforcement

More thought leadership

Thought leadership
Responsible business: Leading the way

A thought leadership and podcast series exploring how responsible business and leadership have changed since the pandemic

Thought leadership
Leadership, the pandemic and lessons in trust

What has leading through the pandemic taught us about trust? We discuss what it takes to create high-trust environments

Thought leadership
Firms risk reputational damage with ‘people insight deficit’ on boards

Susannah Haan discusses the CIPD’s recently published report on the value of people expertise on corporate boards, which will form part of our submission to the FRC Corporate Governance Code consultation

Thought leadership
What does the new flexible working legislation herald for UK workers?

Carl Quilliam discusses what the passing of the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 means, what changes it brings and when they might be implemented