At the time of writing, our findings showed that approximately 25% of employers use zero-hours contracts. While workers on these contracts may be less likely to feel involved at work and see fewer opportunities to develop and improve their skills than employees as a whole, they were also less likely to feel overloaded and under excessive pressure. The proportion of zero-hours contract and short-hours contract employees who said they were satisfied or very satisfied with their jobs – 65% and 67% respectively – was slightly higher than the proportion of employees as a whole (63%).

In the CIPD’s view, the available evidence does not provide a strong case for further legislation to regulate the use of zero-hours contracts, and the best way to improve the working lives of the zero-hours contract workforce is to help more employers understand why they need to develop flexible and fair working practices and how to implement them.

"An outright ban on zero-hours contracts could do more harm than good. Prohibiting contracts that give employees an option to turn work down could lead to some of them withdrawing from the labour force."

This report updates and extends the analysis of zero-hours contract work presented in the 2013 report: Zero-hours contracts: myth and reality.

Download the report below