Employee engagement is a firmly established HR topic. It is referenced in decisions by investors, boards and managers alike. But despite its popularity, this construct faces ongoing challenges: definitions and measures are many and varied, and the research base is often weak. 

Our latest research draws on the best available evidence to answer a selection of practical questions to help people professionals understand employee engagement. We examine what employee engagement is, how to measure it, what outcomes it leads to, and what drives it. This evidence review covers four key areas that are commonly associated with employee engagement:

  • work engagement: whether people feel vigorous, dedicated and absorbed in their work, and other measures carrying the label ‘engagement’  
  • organisational commitment: in particular looking at employees’ psychological feelings (‘affective’ commitment)
  • organisational identification: how employees psychologically associate with their organisations
  • work motivation: factors that lead people to be interested and committed to their job.

See the discussion report for the main insights and practical recommendations for action. 

See the scientific summary for our methodology and technical information on the research and study references.

Employee engagement: An evidence review | Discussion report

Download the discussion report
PDF document 717.9 KB

Employee engagement: An evidence review | Scientific summary

Download the scientific summary
PDF document 570.7 KB

Organisational identification: An evidence review | Scientific summary

Download the scientific summary
PDF document 483.5 KB

Organisational commitment: An evidence review | Scientific summary:

Download the scientific summary
PDF document 496.3 KB

Work motivation: An evidence review | Scientific summary

Download the scientific summary
PDF document 432.2 KB

Experts and stakeholders discuss the value of this research

Key findings

What is employee engagement?   

We recommend referring to ‘employee engagement’ as an umbrella term describing a broad area of people strategy, and referring to narrower constructs – such as work engagement or organisational commitment – when you need to be more specific. This allows you to maintain a broad strategic focus while also prioritising your concerns and what you expect to achieve or improve. 

How should we measure engagement? 

Many questionnaire-based measures relate to employee engagement, but most are not tried and tested to scientific standards. The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale is the most trustworthy measure that carries the label ‘engagement’. Our review also recommends well-established measures of affective organisational commitment, organisational identification and work motivation. 

What’s the evidence on an engagement-performance link?  

Work engagement predicts both task performance and the contributions we make outside our core job (‘contextual performance’). However, these relationships are weak: the performance differences are too small to observe in day-to-day activity and would need to be measured to be detected. To some extent, the relationship is two-way: an improvement in performance will also lead to more engaged workers. Organisational commitment and identification have similar impacts, but the impact on contextual performance is greater than on task performance. There are also additional points to note. For example, identification also affects employees’ attitudes to organisational change.     

What engages or motivates us?  

Several aspects of work and people management consistently crop us as drivers of employee engagement and related constructs. These also feature in the major theories of work motivation. Key points to note include:

  • Workers must feel properly supported by their managers and colleagues and should receive good quality and timely feedback.  
  • Being empowered in one’s job is very important. This includes having work autonomy – for example, being able to make decisions about how and at what pace one works – and having the right skills and the confidence to do a good job.
  • Employees must not feel overwhelmed by the demands of their job.   
  • Employees’ motivations are shaped by individual factors. These include how we identify as people, personally and professionally, and our ability to ‘self-regulate’ or manage our behaviour and not be distracted from our goals.

More on this topic

Bitesize research
Improving feedback to improve performance

This research outlines recommendations for making feedback discussions more constructive, with advice on becoming a good listener and learning about how relationships affect the uptake of feedback

For Members
Bitesize research
Is office space essential for productive work?

Evaluating the pros and cons of working in shared office spaces, and how they impact on productivity

For Members
Bitesize research
Employee voice boosts outcomes of management practices

An examination of how strong channels for employee voice has the potential to drive the effectiveness of high-performance management practices

For Members
Bitesize research
Organisational and employee-focused voice: Why both matter

Researchers explore the differences between ‘organisational’ and employee-focused voice, how they impact employees and what managers can do to foster voice

For Members

Latest evidence reviews

Evidence review
Trust and psychological safety: An evidence review

Find out what the evidence says about building trust and psychological safety

Evidence review
Effective people managers: Evidence review

Research exploring how to develop people managers who drive organisational success

Evidence review
High-performing teams: An evidence review

Explore the latest research on how to create a positive environment to build and nurture effective teams

Evidence review
Productive meetings: An evidence review

This evidence review summarises the latest research on the effective management of meetings and offers recommendations to get the most out of them

All evidence reviews